The climate crisis has produced a new wave of civil disobedience — from Extinction Rebellion's mass disruptions to the Standing Rock water protectors to Indigenous land defenders facing criminalization for protecting what treaty rights guarantee. The philosophical stakes are sharpened by the scale of the injustice: when the harm being resisted is existential and the legal channels have demonstrably failed, the tradition of civil disobedience provides both moral grounding and tactical precedent. The question being raised is whether future generations — who have not yet consented to the decisions being made in their name — have standing in present moral reasoning.
Each step builds on the last.