The relationship between justice and forgiveness is genuinely tense — forgiveness without accountability can function as erasure, releasing the perpetrator from consequences before the harm is even acknowledged; but the insistence on punishment without possibility of repair can trap everyone in a permanent economy of grievance. The traditions that have navigated this best tend to hold the tension rather than resolve it: insisting that accountability is the precondition for forgiveness, that genuine remorse is not the same as strategic regret, and that neither the harmed person's right to their anger nor their potential path through it should be foreclosed. Forgiveness is not owed; it is possible.
Each step builds on the last.