When an AI generates information, it's predicting what words should come next based on patterns in training data—not consulting a database or checking facts. Sometimes those predictions land on real information; sometimes they don't, and the system has no way to know the difference.
There's a quirk in how AI works that every traveler should understand: sometimes AI tools confidently describe restaurants, hotels, or tours that don't actually exist. This is called a hallucination—not because the AI is confused in a confused way, but because it can generate plausible-sounding information even when it doesn't have factual data to back it up.
Here's what's happening under the hood: AI models are trained on massive amounts of text data, and they learn to predict what words come next in a sentence based on patterns. When you ask "What's a great romantic dinner spot in Lisbon," the AI predicts words that sound like a reasonable restaurant name, description, and location. It sounds authoritative—maybe it invents "O Fado Clássico" on a charming side street with candlelit tables. But the restaurant was never trained into the AI's data; it simply assembled words that fit the pattern of how restaurants are described.
This is different from making a mistake or being wrong. The AI isn't trying to deceive you; it's doing what it was designed to do—generate coherent text. But it has no built-in way to distinguish between information it actually "knows" (learned from training data) and information it's hallucinating (predicting based on patterns).
Why does this matter for travel? Because a hallucinated recommendation might send you to an address that's actually a bank, or to a restaurant that closed two years ago. More insidiously, a hallucinated review quote or star rating can make a made-up place sound appealing. You might plan your whole evening around a nonexistent experience.
The fix is verification. Think of AI travel recommendations as a brainstorming partner, not a final source. When you get suggestions from an AI tool, verify the key ones: Does the restaurant have a real website? Can you find it on Google Maps? Are there actual reviews? Are the operating hours current? This takes 2 minutes per recommendation and prevents wasted time.
Some AI tools are better at avoiding hallucinations than others, particularly those that can search the internet in real-time (like Perplexity AI). These tools can ground their recommendations in current data. But even then, verification is wise.
The silver lining: hallucinations usually happen with specific details (restaurant names, exact addresses) rather than broad advice. If an AI says "Lisbon has good seafood restaurants in the Ribeira district," that's likely accurate. If it names a specific restaurant with a review quote, verify first.
Try this: Ask an AI tool to recommend three specific restaurants in any destination. Take one recommendation and google it—search the name, address, and phone number. You'll quickly get a feel for which tools tend to generate more accurate recommendations and which require more verification. Keep notes on this as you plan; it helps you calibrate your trust in future suggestions.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.