Different AI tools have different strengths—some excel at writing, others at math, still others at generating study materials—and choosing wrong wastes time on mediocre results. A clear inventory of your actual study needs and the specific capabilities of available tools prevents the common trap of treating all AI as interchangeable.
Different AI tools have different strengths. ChatGPT is versatile and well-rounded. Claude is careful and thoughtful. Google Gemini is integrated with Google products. Perplexity AI searches the web in real-time. Notebooklm is brilliant for analyzing documents. Cursor is built for coding. Picking the right tool for your task is like choosing the right tool from a toolbox—the hammer is great for nails, but useless for screws.
Understanding this saves time, money, and frustration. Using the wrong tool means spending more tokens, getting mediocre results, or hitting limitations that don't exist in the right tool.
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Best for: General-purpose tasks, writing, brainstorming, coding, customer service
Strengths: Wide knowledge, good at following complex instructions, plus-version offers web search
Weakness: Occasional hallucinations on factual claims without web search
Claude (Anthropic)
Best for: Long-form content, detailed analysis, safety-sensitive tasks, reasoning
Strengths: Careful, acknowledges uncertainty, handles large documents well, strong at following constraints
Weakness: Slower and sometimes more verbose than ChatGPT
Google Gemini
Best for: Google integration, image analysis, real-time information (in some versions)
Strengths: Access to Google Search, handles images well, good coding ability
Weakness: Less mature than ChatGPT or Claude in some areas
Perplexity AI
Best for: Current events, fact-checking, researched answers, citations
Strengths: Searches the web in real-time, provides sources, better for recent information
Weakness: Better as a research tool than creative tool
NotebookLM
Best for: Analyzing your own documents, research summaries, pulling insights from files
Strengths: Designed for document analysis, can upload PDFs and long texts
Weakness: Not for general-purpose tasks
Cursor
Best for: Coding, code review, debugging
Strengths: Built for developers, integrates with code editors, excellent code understanding
Weakness: Overkill for non-coding tasks
A practical note: you don't need to subscribe to everything. ChatGPT Plus (paid) covers most needs. If you need one specific strength (coding, document analysis, web search), add that tool. Most people do fine with one main tool and one specialized tool.
Common misconception: one tool is objectively "best." The truth: the best tool is the one that fits your specific task. A developer might find Cursor invaluable while a writer never touches it.
Try this: Think of three tasks you commonly ask AI to do. Look up the strengths of three different tools. For each task, identify which tool would likely work best. Next time you do that task, try the recommended tool and compare the result to what you'd normally get.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.