Providing AI with your specific legal situation—whether you're a startup in healthcare, a lender, a software vendor, someone planning an exit—makes analysis vastly more useful because the AI can flag risks that matter to you specifically rather than generic issues that might not apply. This context transforms analysis from abstract legal commentary into actionable guidance tied to your actual circumstances.
The better the information you give AI, the better its analysis. But legal contexts are complex: your situation involves history, relationships, documents, and jurisdiction-specific rules. How do you give AI everything it needs without losing your privacy or confusing it?
Lawyers build context in conversation. They ask questions, listen to answers, then ask follow-ups based on what matters. AI can do this too, but only if you structure the information clearly. Context means: the sequence of events, the people involved, what you want as an outcome, and the constraints you're operating under (budget, timeline, relationship preservation).
For example, if you're drafting a lease amendment for a difficult tenant, context includes: how long they've rented from you, what specifically you want to change, whether you want to preserve the relationship, and your state's landlord-tenant law. Without that context, AI might suggest changes that are legally solid but totally wrong for your situation.
Start with the simplest question first, then add detail progressively. Begin with: "I'm in [state] and need help with [specific issue]." Then add: "Here's the background: [timeline of events]." Then add: "Here's what I want: [outcome]." Then add: "Here are constraints: [what matters to you]." This layered approach lets AI focus on what's actually relevant instead of trying to parse everything at once.
For document review, provide the document (if it's safe to share), then ask AI to summarize it, then ask specific questions based on that summary. This focuses AI's analysis better than asking everything at once.
Redact identifying information when it doesn't matter. Instead of full names, use "Party A" and "Party B." Instead of exact amounts, use "$X." This reduces privacy risk while still giving AI the context it needs. However, if jurisdiction matters, keep that detail—different states have very different legal rules.
Don't share privileged information. Attorney-client privilege protects conversations between you and your lawyer. Information you share with AI tools is not protected the same way, so treat it like sharing with a stranger. If you're deeply concerned about privacy, work with an actual lawyer instead.
Complex situations need nuance that even good context can't capture. If your legal problem involves: significant money, other people's welfare, criminal law, or high stakes in any way, hire a lawyer. AI is best for straightforward situations where you need clarity before deciding whether to hire professional help.
Try this: Write out your legal question in one paragraph. Then rewrite it in three paragraphs adding: background/timeline, your desired outcome, and constraints. Compare how clear each version is. Then use the three-paragraph version to ask Claude or ChatGPT. Notice how much better the response gets.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.