Contrarian feedback prompting asks an AI (or a critical reader) to actively punch holes in your argument rather than simply critique it—to find the strongest possible objection, play devil's advocate, and expose assumptions you didn't know you were making. This forcing function is far more useful than polite feedback because it reveals the places where your thinking is actually weak.
Contrarian feedback prompting instructs an AI to argue directly against your thesis or essay claims, generating the strongest possible objections a professor or peer reviewer might raise against your work.
Exposing your arguments to structured opposition before submission helps you preemptively address counterarguments, which is one of the clearest signals of critical thinking that graders reward.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.