Getting useful dating advice from an AI depends on being specific about your actual situation rather than asking vague questions, and being honest about what you're trying to figure out rather than what you think you should want. The better you describe the real problem, the more grounded the guidance becomes.
Prompt engineering is the skill of asking AI exactly what you need so it gives you useful answers instead of generic platitudes. A weak prompt like 'Should I text them?' gets vague advice. A strong prompt includes context, your goals, and specific constraints—resulting in advice you can actually act on.
In dating, most people ask AI the wrong way. They say 'Is this a good idea?' when they should say 'Here's my situation, here's what I'm worried about, here's what I value—what should I do?' The second approach gives answers tailored to your real life, not a template answer.
A good prompt has four parts: context (the actual situation), your perspective (what you want and value), the specific question, and any constraints. Example:
'I've been texting someone for 4 days. The conversation is easy and feels genuine, but they haven't suggested meeting in person. I'm worried that pushing for a date seems too forward or desperate. I'm not interested in endless messaging—I want to meet people who are actually ready for dating. Should I suggest a date, and if so, how would I phrase it without seeming pushy?'
Compare that to 'Should I ask them out?' The first gives AI enough information to give you real advice. The second gets a generic response that doesn't account for your actual situation or values.
Vague requests: 'What should I say?' (about what, in which context, with what goal?)
Too much irrelevant detail: Three paragraphs of backstory that don't affect the actual decision
Unclear values: Expecting AI to know what matters to you without stating it
No constraints: Not mentioning practical limitations ('I can't meet until next Friday')
Asking for mind-reading: 'What are they thinking?' AI can't predict thoughts; it can only read observable signals
Start with a template: 'Here's what happened: [concrete facts]. Here's what I want: [your goal]. Here's what worries me: [specific concern]. Here's what I value: [your priorities]. Given all that, what would you recommend?' This framework works for almost any dating situation and generates way better advice.
Also, follow up on answers. If an AI suggests something, ask 'Why would that work?' or 'What could go wrong?' This forces clarity and often reveals assumptions that might not fit your situation.
Good use: Generating conversation ideas, analyzing communication patterns, helping you think through decisions, perspective-checking your assumptions
Poor use: Predicting someone's feelings, deciding if you should pursue someone, replacing your own judgment about what feels right
Try this: Think of a dating situation you're currently uncertain about. Write out the full context (what happened, what you're worried about, what you want), then ask ChatGPT: 'Given [all that context], what would you recommend I do, and why might that approach work?' Compare the response to what you'd get from 'What should I do?' Notice how much more useful the answer is when you've been specific.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.