The practice of building networks of mutual support and shared responsibility, preventing both individual vulnerability and diffusion of accountability.
Sor Juana was isolated; few could publicly defend her. Corruption often succeeds because individuals stand alone, making them vulnerable to retaliation or co-option. Building collective accountability—networks of colleagues, communities, and institutions that stand together—strengthens anticorruption work. Whistleblower networks, solidarity unions, mutual aid societies, and professional associations that commit to ethical standards create collective pressure against corruption that single individuals cannot exert. This also prevents the dilution of accountability: when everyone is slightly complicit, no one is clearly responsible. Collective structures name responsibility clearly and distribute both the burden and the strength. Sor Juana's intellectual community, though small, sustained her; modern anticorruption work depends on scaling this: creating dense networks where truth-telling is normal, supported, and collective rather than individual and isolating.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.