Periagoge
Concept
1 min read

Consent and Epistemic Coercion

The principle that forced silence, censorship, or suppression of one's thoughts violates consent as fundamentally as physical coercion violates bodily autonomy.

Juana
Why It Matters

Sor Juana was pressured by Church authorities to renounce her intellectual pursuits and take vows of silence on matters of theology and science. She resisted this epistemic coercion—the attempt to control what she could think, study, and express—as a violation of her freedom. In Libertarian justice, consent requires genuine agency over one's own mind and voice. When institutions demand intellectual conformity or silence, they coerce individuals into non-voluntary states. Sor Juana's tradition teaches that epistemic coercion is as grave as economic coercion: both strip individuals of self-determination. Freedom requires not only the absence of physical force but also the right to form, hold, and express one's own ideas. Libertarian justice cannot exist where people are forced into intellectual compliance. Sor Juana's refusal to be silenced modeled how defending thought-freedom is defending all freedom.

Helpful guides
Juana
Identity & Justice
Peri
Questions about Consent and Epistemic Coercion?

Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.

Ready to work on Consent and Epistemic Coercion?

Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.