Recognizing that oppressive institutions can simultaneously offer real opportunities and freedoms, requiring navigation rather than simple rejection.
The convent was patriarchal, constraining, and limiting—and it was also Sor Juana's path to literacy, solitude, intellectual work, and relative autonomy. Many convents in colonial Latin America offered women education and community impossible elsewhere. This contradiction is central to intersectionality in practice. Corporations, universities, governments, and other institutions are often sites of both opportunity and oppression for marginalized people. Rejecting them entirely may mean losing access to resources; staying uncritically means complicity. Sor Juana's approach—using the space while documenting its constraints—offers a model. In practice, this means: holding institutions accountable without demonizing people who work within them, understanding why some marginalized people must or choose to participate despite harm, avoiding purity politics that demand people refuse all tainted institutions, and working toward actual alternatives while people live in imperfect systems.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.