Framework asserting that children's necessary dependence on caregivers does not diminish their dignity or right to respectful, autonomous treatment.
Children are dependent—they require care, protection, and guidance. Traditional frameworks sometimes use this dependency to justify treating children as objects rather than subjects, stripping them of voice and dignity. Sor Juana's experience in the convent showed how institutional dependency could be weaponized against intellectual freedom. This concept distinguishes between functional dependence (children need food, shelter, guidance) and hierarchical domination (children have no right to voice, choice, or respect). A child can need care while deserving dignity. Applied to children's rights, this reframes dependency relationships. Caregiving can honor a child's dignity through respectful communication, involving them in decisions affecting their lives, and recognizing their emerging capacities. A child cannot consent to all decisions but can participate meaningfully in many. This framework opposes both extremes: neither denying children's real needs for protection nor using that need to justify authoritarianism. It creates space for caring relationships that remain fundamentally respectful of the child's humanity and growing personhood throughout development.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.