Periagoge
Concept
1 min read

Epistemic Injustice in Policing

The harm caused when police and institutions systematically discount or disbelieve accounts from people of certain cultures or backgrounds, denying them credibility.

Juana
Why It Matters

Sor Juana documented how authorities dismissed women's intellectual contributions and indigenous peoples' knowledge systems, an injustice operating at the level of belief and credibility itself. Epistemic injustice in policing occurs when officers pre-judge the trustworthiness of community members based on racial, ethnic, or cultural stereotypes, leading to biased investigations, ignored victim reports, and unjust accusations. When immigrant women fear reporting crimes because police will discount their accounts, or when youth from marginalized communities know their version of events will be disbelieved regardless of evidence, the system denies them testimonial credibility based on identity. This concept demands that police institutions actively work to recognize and counteract these patterns—implementing victim-centered protocols, training officers to examine their credibility judgments, and creating accountability when epistemic injustice occurs. Authentic intercultural policing requires genuinely listening to and believing community members across cultural differences.

Helpful guides
Juana
Identity & Justice
Peri
Questions about Epistemic Injustice in Policing?

Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.

Ready to work on Epistemic Injustice in Policing?

Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.