Animals possess forms of knowledge and perception systematically excluded from moral and legal consideration, constituting epistemic injustice.
Sor Juana critiqued how women's knowledge and experience were dismissed as inferior or irrelevant in male-dominated intellectual systems. Epistemic justice means recognizing whose knowledge counts. Animals experience the world through non-human sensory systems—echolocation, electromagnetic fields, ultraviolet vision, olfactory landscapes humans cannot access. Yet animal experience is routinely treated as unreliable or irrelevant in policy and ethics. A bat's world, a whale's acoustic environment, a dog's olfactory knowledge—these represent legitimate forms of knowing systematically excluded from human-centered frameworks. Sor Juana demanded that women's perspectives be heard; extending this principle means listening to what animal behavior, communication, and presence teach us. Their ways of knowing the world deserve credibility. This framework shifts animal ethics from charity toward animals into recognizing them as knowers whose perspectives illuminate reality differently than human rationalism alone.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.