Epistemic Justice and Environmental Voice

Sor Juana's observations and arguments were systematically discredited because of her gender and religious position, not their merit—a pattern of epistemic injustice. Climate activism reveals similar dynamics: women scientists' research is cited less; indigenous land stewards are excluded from conservation decisions; communities of color experiencing environmental racism lack policy influence. Epistemic justice in climate governance means actively centering the voices, data, and frameworks of those most affected by climate change and environmental destruction. Pacific Island nations threatened by rising seas must lead climate negotiations; African smallholder farmers must shape agricultural policy; frontline communities must design local solutions. Sor Juana's legacy demands we dismantle credibility deficits based on race, gender, class, and geography. True climate justice requires trusting and amplifying the knowledge of those with most at stake—those whose survival depends on getting solutions right.