The framework for recognizing whose knowledge, experience, and interpretation are deemed legitimate within systems that privilege certain genders over others.
Epistemological injustice occurs when someone's ability to be recognized as a knower is compromised based on social identity. Sor Juana experienced this directly—her scientific observations, theological arguments, and poetic insights were constantly delegitimized by those who believed women lacked the rational capacity for such work. Contemporary examination of cisgender identity reveals similar patterns: certain people's knowledge about gender, emotion, relationships, or experience is automatically dismissed or patronized based on their gender presentation. This concept from Sor Juana's tradition asks: Who is believed when they speak about their own identity? Whose interpretations of gender are treated as authoritative? Her response was to document her intellectual process meticulously, creating undeniable evidence of her reasoning capacity. For those exploring cisgender identity, recognizing epistemological justice means validating the self-knowledge of all genders and refusing to assume expertise based on stereotypes.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.