A practice of rigorous self-reflection about our relationships with animals, inspired by the Socratic principle Sor Juana championed, challenging unexamined assumptions in animal treatment.
Sor Juana's commitment to intellectual inquiry as a moral imperative—"the examined life"—becomes a transformative practice regarding animals. Rather than accepting cultural norms about meat consumption, animal research, or pet ownership without question, this concept demands we scrutinize our justifications. What assumptions underlie our treatment of specific animals? Why do we protect dogs but eat pigs? How do economic interests shape our beliefs about animal capacity for suffering? This rigorous examination mirrors Sor Juana's fearless questioning of religious and social authority. By applying philosophical rigor to animal ethics, we expose contradictions in our moral reasoning. We confront cognitive dissonance between stated values and actions. The examined life becomes uncomfortable but necessary, forcing us to either change behavior or consciously acknowledge the gap between belief and practice, making moral complicity visible and therefore undeniable.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.