The practice of questioning and challenging systems of power while remaining embedded in them, using institutional resources against institutional constraints.
Sor Juana worked within the Catholic Church and used convent resources to build an extraordinary library and intellectual life, yet she wrote critiques of ecclesiastical authority and defenses of her right to pursue secular knowledge. She did not have the luxury of opting out entirely, but she practiced a sophisticated form of resistance: strategic compliance, intellectual subversion, and the patient accumulation of knowledge and credibility. This practice is relevant for secular people who work within religious institutions or live in religious societies. Rather than viewing this as hypocrisy, Sor Juana's example suggests it as pragmatic negotiation. One can use institutional resources, maintain surface respectability, and simultaneously build an alternative intellectual and moral framework. For atheists and secular people in constrained contexts—whether for economic reasons, family ties, or professional necessity—this concept validates the possibility of inner autonomy and gradual emancipation. The goal is not purity but freedom: extracting what is useful, resisting what is harmful, and maintaining one's integrity until circumstances allow fuller expression.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.