The mechanisms through which institutions (Church, academia, publishing) control who can participate in knowledge production, systematically excluding women through formal and informal barriers.
Sor Juana navigated the Catholic Church's control over intellectual discourse, where women's participation in theological and philosophical debate was heavily restricted. Institutional gatekeeping is a primary mechanism of structural gender inequality: universities required male status, monasteries limited women's scholarly roles, publishing houses favored male authors. These barriers operate through policies, cultural norms, and informal networks that determine whose ideas circulate and whose are silenced. Understanding gatekeeping reveals that inequality is not merely individual prejudice but systematic architecture. Institutions preserve male dominance by controlling credentials, access to platforms, peer review processes, and funding. Women scholars historically had to work around, beneath, or outside formal institutions. This concept illuminates how changing surface-level policies without addressing institutional culture leaves gatekeeping intact. True structural change requires examining who sets standards, whose work is validated, and which voices institutions amplify or suppress.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.