Recognizing that denying people voice, education, and the right to think constitutes structural violence requiring restoration, not punishment.
Sor Juana experienced institutional attempts to silence her intellect as violence—not physical, but fundamentally harmful to her humanity and capacity to contribute to justice. Intellectual suppression is a form of systemic harm often invisible in punitive frameworks, which focus on physical crime. Yet excluding women from education, suppressing Indigenous knowledge systems, censoring dissidents, and denying poor communities access to literacy are forms of harm that devastate societies. Restorative approaches informed by Sor Juana recognize intellectual suppression as a primary site of injustice. Restoration means ensuring voice, creating platforms for silenced knowledge, supporting the intellectual development of marginalized people, and holding institutions accountable for censorship and exclusion. This reframes what counts as harm: not only crimes but the systematic denial of recognition and intellectual agency. When Indigenous peoples reclaim their languages, when women's histories are centered, when poor communities lead their own knowledge-making, these are restorative acts addressing deep historical harm. Sor Juana's legacy insists that a just society must restore intellectual freedom as foundational to all other restoration.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.