Children's experiences of rights violations are shaped by intersecting identities; effective advocacy must address how multiple marginalized statuses compound disadvantage.
Sor Juana's life was constrained by intersecting oppressions: she was a woman, of mixed racial heritage, illegitimate, and poor before entering the convent. Her intellectual suppression cannot be understood through a single oppression but only through their intersection. This framework applies critically to children's rights: a Black girl's experience of childhood differs from a white boy's; an Indigenous child's schooling is shaped by colonial violence; a disabled child faces distinct barriers; a transgender child navigates identity and safety in particular ways. Effective children's rights work must recognize these intersections rather than treating children as an undifferentiated category. Policies designed without attention to intersectionality may protect some children while harming others. For instance, curfew laws may protect against danger but criminalize Black and Indigenous youth; gender-affirming care benefits transgender children but may be restricted by policies designed without their needs in view. Sor Juana's model teaches intersectional consciousness: understanding how multiple systems of oppression operate simultaneously and requiring responses that address their interaction. Children's rights frameworks must explicitly analyze how race, class, gender, ability, sexuality, immigration status, and other dimensions combine to shape each child's experience, and must build advocacy that addresses these intersections with sophistication and care.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.