How we name and describe animals determines whether we see them as subjects worthy of moral consideration or mere objects for use.
Sor Juana was acutely aware that language shapes reality—that how we speak determines what we can think and how we act. She challenged the language of her time that positioned women as naturally inferior, demonstrating that linguistic categories are imposed, not natural. This applies directly to animals: our language systematically reduces them to utility. We use meat industry terminology ('livestock,' 'harvest,' 'production') that obscures living beings; we speak of animals in third person, denying them subjectivity. Sor Juana would recognize this as a justice issue. Renaming—calling animals by names acknowledging their individuality, referring to them with pronouns recognizing their subjectivity, using language that captures their actual capacities and experiences—becomes a practice of moral recognition. The way we speak about animals creates the conceptual space where moral consideration either flourishes or withers. Careful, truthful language about animal reality is not mere semantics but foundational ethical work.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.