The way religious institutions encode authority as masculine while coding questioning, intuition, and skepticism as feminine, feminizing doubt itself.
Sor Juana faced not only institutional resistance to intellectual women but a theology that treated masculine authority (bishops, theologians, God-the-Father) as normative while characterizing women's intellectual ambition as unseemly transgression. Masculine doctrine names how religious institutions use gender ideology to naturalize hierarchy. This concept illuminates how religious identity questions are never purely intellectual but always gendered. Women doubters face particular resistance: your questioning is coded as unfeminine, insubordinate, unnatural. Men may face different pressures—to maintain rational certainty, to lead rather than question. For those navigating religious identity, this framework asks: whose voice am I internalizing when I feel doubt is wrong? Which authorities am I treating as legitimate? Sor Juana's example shows that intellectual doubt itself was feminized as weakness—a useful tool of control. Understanding how gender and religious authority intertwine helps all people recognize which resistances to doubt are genuinely spiritual and which are simply patriarchal enforcement. This concept politicizes religious identity as inseparable from gender politics.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.