The fairness act of asserting claims about injustice and capability before full evidence exists, because waiting for proof often means never challenging established systems.
Sor Juana asserted her intellectual capacity and women's right to learn in an era when neither could be definitively proven within the logic systems available to her. Fairness sometimes requires acting on incomplete evidence, because complete evidence often cannot be gathered within systems designed to exclude you. If women had waited for universally accepted proof of their intellectual capacity before demanding education, they would have waited forever—the proof could not be generated without the education. This is a fairness paradox: the excluded must sometimes assert their claims before they can be proven, and those in power will always demand more proof. Sor Juana's courage lay partly in naming her capability and rights as truths even when she could not definitively prove them by the standards of her time. She understood that waiting for perfect certainty means accepting ongoing injustice. True fairness recognizes the legitimacy of testimony from the excluded and the problem of demanding proof from those systematically denied the conditions to generate it.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.