Our power over animals creates asymmetrical moral responsibility, a principle emerging from Sor Juana's critique of how power perpetuates injustice.
Sor Juana observed how those with power typically used it to silence and control others, justifying oppression through claims of natural superiority. This insight reveals a critical dynamic in human-animal relationships: we possess overwhelming power over animals, yet this power creates rather than diminishes our moral responsibility toward them. The paradox is that dominance increases obligation. We cannot exploit vulnerable beings and claim innocence; power entails accountability. Sor Juana's tradition rejects the logic that might makes right. Applied to animals, this means our capacity to breed, confine, and use animals does not justify doing so. Rather, our power creates the very obligation to consider their interests carefully. We cannot hide behind necessity when alternatives exist, nor claim that animals lack the capacity to understand our treatment as relevant to their moral standing. The paradox of power demands that we use our intelligence and agency to protect rather than exploit the vulnerable. Our dominance over animals becomes the ground of our responsibility to them, not permission for their exploitation.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.