The epistemological claim that direct encounter and lived experience carry validity equal to or greater than inherited institutional doctrine.
Sor Juana privileged observation and reason above scholastic repetition, arguing that knowledge must be tested against reality. In religious identity transitions, this concept asks: what authority does your own spiritual experience carry against what you have been told to believe? If your prayers feel unanswered, if your faith produces shame rather than peace, if your moral intuitions conflict with your tradition's teachings, does lived experience constitute valid knowledge? For many moving from believer to doubter to leaver, the tipping point comes not from intellectual argument but from accumulated personal experience that contradicts institutional claims. A person may intellectually defend their faith while their lived experience screams otherwise. Sor Juana's epistemology suggests that when personal experience and doctrine diverge, both merit serious attention—and that denying your own experience in favor of authority is a kind of epistemic violence against yourself.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.