Using inquiry, skepticism, and interrogation to challenge authoritative claims and disrupt assumed hierarchies of knowledge.
Sor Juana's theological and philosophical writings frequently employed questions rather than pronouncements—a rhetorical strategy that challenged rather than asserted authority. This concept elevates questioning as revolutionary practice particularly necessary under disadvantage. Systems of inequality maintain power through claimed certainty: that hierarchies are natural, that disadvantage is deserved, that alternatives are impossible. Strategic questioning disrupts this certainty by demanding justification, revealing assumptions, and opening intellectual space. The Socratic method becomes tool for those without institutional authority: by asking, one invites critical thinking rather than demanding obedience. For communities experiencing structural disadvantage, this framework validates doubt, skepticism, and interrogation as legitimate intellectual practices. It recognizes that those denied formal power can exercise intellectual power through persistent questioning that reveals the contingency and injustice of systems presented as inevitable.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.