Strategic non-compliance with systems of exploitation as a foundational ethical stance, following Sor Juana's refusal to accept prescribed limitations.
Sor Juana refused—refused to recant her intellectual ambitions, refused to accept the Church's limitations, refused to be silenced. This stance of refusal becomes a moral framework for animal rights: systematic refusal to participate in systems that exploit animals. This goes beyond individual dietary choices to encompass broader refusal of normalized exploitation. It means questioning institutions, industries, and cultural practices built on animal domination. Sor Juana's refusals were costly, demonstrating that moral integrity sometimes demands sacrifice of comfort and status. Similarly, genuine animal advocacy requires refusing convenient complicity, even when refusal creates social friction or personal inconvenience. This concept positions veganism, boycotts, and activism not as external additions to ethics but as essential expressions of moral integrity. Refusal becomes the practice through which we align our actions with our values, embodying the same courage that animated Sor Juana's intellectual resistance.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.