The strategic and creative use of saying no—to narrow definitions, assigned roles, and the terms of engagement—as a form of intersectional resistance and self-determination.
Sor Juana refused the expected roles for women of her time and status—she refused marriage, refused to abandon intellectual pursuits, refused the limiting identities imposed upon her. Refusal is not mere negation but a creative practice of self-definition. In intersectional contexts, refusal means declining to accept the terms of engagement set by those with more power. This includes refusing to be categorized into single identity boxes, refusing to perform emotional labor for oppressors, refusing simplistic narratives about marginalized communities, refusing to separate struggles. Refusal can take forms from dramatic public renunciation to quiet withdrawal of cooperation. It names the right to say no as a fundamental act of freedom. In practice, intersectional refusal might mean individuals refusing to choose between aspects of their identity, communities refusing assimilationist demands, or scholars refusing to frame their work within oppressive disciplinary frameworks. This concept honors refusal not as destructive but as essential to self-determination and collective liberation.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.