Periagoge
Concept
1 min read

The Right to Refuse Reconciliation

Asserting that justice does not require victims to forgive, and that refusal of reconciliation can itself be a valid form of justice.

Juana
Why It Matters

Sor Juana ultimately refused to be silenced or transformed into a penitent martyr; she withdrew from public intellectual life rather than submit to demands for contrition she did not feel. Her choice honors a dimension of justice often erased: the right to refuse reconciliation. The justice-forgiveness tension often resolves in favor of forgiveness, treating it as the moral terminus and highest good. Sor Juana's example insists otherwise. Sometimes justice requires accountability without reconciliation, boundary-setting without relationship restoration, and clear refusal without apology. Not every harm deserves forgiveness; not every perpetrator deserves a second chance; not every victim must prioritize the emotional comfort of those who harmed them. Her tradition teaches that victims' autonomy includes the right to say no—no to forgiveness, no to continued relationship, no to pretending transformation has occurred when it hasn't. This right is itself a justice claim. It asserts that harmed people are not obligated to perform emotional labor for perpetrators' redemption narratives.

Helpful guides
Juana
Identity & Justice
Peri
Questions about The Right to Refuse Reconciliation?

Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.

Ready to work on The Right to Refuse Reconciliation?

Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.