A foundational principle that both those who harm and those harmed deserve genuine listening and full voice in justice processes, not silencing.
Sor Juana's silencing—her loss of access to her library, her prohibition from writing—was itself a profound injustice layered atop institutional rejection. She claimed the right to explain her intellectual commitments, to respond to accusations, to have her voice matter. In restorative justice, this becomes procedural: all participants must have genuine opportunity to speak and be heard. Punitive systems often deny voice; the accused has limited input, the harmed may be excluded from process, and neither gains understanding. Sor Juana's insistence on her right to be heard models a justice that treats communication as central rather than incidental. Restorative circles, dialogues, and conferences operationalize this principle. When people can fully express themselves—their harm, their intentions, their contexts, their needs—healing becomes possible. This concept rejects the notion that justice can be administered to passive subjects; instead, it recognizes that justice requires active participation and voice from all involved.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.