Periagoge
Concept
1 min read

The Right to Question as Restorative Practice

Creating space for harmed and harming parties to ask difficult questions and seek understanding serves justice better than enforced silence or predetermined punishments.

Juana
Why It Matters

Sor Juana refused enforced silence, insisting on her right to question religious authority, gender norms, and intellectual hierarchies. This practice of questioning—even uncomfortable inquiry—mirrors restorative justice's emphasis on dialogue. When harm occurs, both parties need permission to ask: "Why did this happen? What was lost? How can we move forward?" Punitive systems silence these questions, replacing them with predetermined sentences. Restorative approaches follow Sor Juana's model: creating protected space where difficult inquiries can happen without fear of retaliation. The harmed person can ask the harmer to account for their actions; the harmer can ask for understanding of their own circumstances. This intellectual honesty, championed by Sor Juana throughout her life, becomes the engine of genuine restoration. Questions that courts forbid become pathways to healing and transformation that punishment cannot achieve.

Helpful guides
Juana
Identity & Justice
Peri
Questions about The Right to Question as Restorative Practice?

Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.

Ready to work on The Right to Question as Restorative Practice?

Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.