A framework for determining which laws deserve obedience by ranking divine justice, natural law, and human law in a moral hierarchy.
Sor Juana navigated a complex system of religious, civil, and social laws, strategically choosing where to comply and where to resist, always appealing to a higher moral order. She framed her intellectual work as obedience to divine truth rather than rebellion against authority. MLK systematized this in his theory of just and unjust laws: laws aligned with moral law deserve obedience; laws violating human dignity do not. This provides the philosophical justification for civil disobedience—it is not lawlessness but obedience to a higher law. For practitioners, this concept requires developing moral clarity about which laws express justice and which enforce injustice. It means accepting punishment for lawbreaking while maintaining moral authority by demonstrating that one's violation serves justice. The hierarchy of laws creates a decision-making framework: consult conscience first, reason second, then positive law. This approach transforms selective obedience from hypocrisy into a coherent moral philosophy grounded in justice itself.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.