The practice of discerning when to speak truth and when to remain silent for survival, relevant to how marginalized voices navigate justice processes.
Sor Juana lived within constraints, using silence strategically to preserve her intellectual freedom and safety. This concept recognizes that in restorative justice, not all silences indicate consent or healing. Survivors and those from marginalized communities may withhold their full truth due to power imbalances, fear of retaliation, or previous betrayals by systems claiming to help. Restorative practitioners must develop wisdom about the difference between protective silence and genuine voice. Sor Juana's example teaches that asking someone to speak before they feel genuinely safe can replicate historical harms. True restoration requires creating conditions where silence itself is respected as a valid choice, and where practitioners work to transform the underlying conditions that make strategic silence necessary. This honors both the intellectual and emotional sovereignty of all participants.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.