Platforms optimizing for less engagement, lower growth, and reduced scale paradoxically achieve healthier political outcomes.
Taoist philosophy rejects endless growth as fundamentally unnatural and destabilizing. Applied to algorithmic politics, this suggests that platforms measuring success through engagement metrics and user growth create pathological incentive structures that corrupt political discourse. A platform succeeding by growing infinitely must amplify the most sensational, divisive content—exactly what damages political health. Instead, platforms designed for degrowth—measuring success by depth of discourse rather than breadth, by quality of deliberation rather than quantity of users, by the health of political outcomes rather than corporate metrics—align with Taoist principles. Such platforms would celebrate when users engage less often but more meaningfully, when they leave satisfied rather than addicted, when the community self-regulates rather than demanding algorithmic intervention. This economic reorientation seems counterintuitive but reflects deeper understanding: a small community with genuine political capacity exceeds a vast platform optimizing for addiction and polarization.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.