Laozi's emptiness teaches that a device's value lies in its use-life and repairability, not its newness; planned obsolescence violates both Taoist and sustainable principles.
Planned obsolescence—deliberately designing products to fail or become unfashionable—represents everything Taoist philosophy opposes. While companies defend it as innovation or market response, Laozi would recognize it as forcing artificiality: convincing people to discard working tools, creating unnecessary waste, generating suffering and environmental damage for corporate profit. The wisdom of emptiness applies here: a device achieves its purpose through use and longevity, not through constant replacement. A phone designed to last and be repaired possesses more true value than one engineered to fail and be replaced annually. This concept directly challenges the technology industry's business model. Sustainable technology companies like Framework, Fairphone, and Repair.org embody the Taoist principle: designing for longevity, repairability, and upgrade rather than replacement. They prove that business success doesn't require planned obsolescence. The concept also illuminates hidden costs in our devices: the environmental extraction for materials, the energy for manufacturing, the waste from disposal—costs externalized so companies can sell more units. Laozi would ask: is this wise? Sustainable technology answers no, proposing instead that durability and repairability represent both ethical necessity and business opportunity.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.