Contrast between regulated (named) and unregulated (unnamed) economic activity on blockchain reveals both possibilities and dangers.
Extending Laozi's principle that "the named is not the eternal," blockchain enables economic activity in both named (regulated, kyc-verified, compliant) and unnamed (pseudonymous, private, unregulated) forms. The unnamed economy represents the Tao itself—infinite, uncontrolled, beyond regulatory categories. The named economy gains legitimacy but loses freedom; the unnamed economy maintains freedom but lacks social trust and infrastructure. Neither is purely good or bad; they represent complementary modes. Bitcoin initially emphasized the unnamed—anonymous, censorship-resistant value transfer. Gradually, named infrastructure emerged: exchanges, custody, institutional participation. Taoist wisdom recognizes both can coexist. The unnamed economy serves those escaping control, preserving freedom and exploring possibilities. The named economy provides liquidity and legitimacy. The healthiest ecosystem allows both, recognizing that attempting to fully name the unnamed only drives it further underground. Balance between transparency and privacy creates sustainable decentralization.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.