Laozi's teaching that naming creates separation applied to how credentials, canonicity, and authority structures restrict access to printing and publication.
The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao—this opening paradox reveals how naming creates boundaries that separate and exclude. Applied to knowledge democratization, naming functions as gatekeeping: canonical texts, credentialed authors, official publishers, and institutional approval all use naming to divide legitimate from illegitimate knowledge. Medieval printing restricted authority to the Church and nobility; their names legitimized texts. The printing press disrupted this by enabling anonymous, self-published, and marginal voices to circulate. Laozi would recognize that naming systems—determining who counts as author, expert, or authority—fundamentally control what knowledge circulates. Democratization requires examining these naming structures. Should publishing require institutional affiliation? Professional credentials? Publisher approval? The Taoist perspective suggests that wisdom and valuable knowledge exist beyond official naming systems, in margins, in anonymous works, in oral traditions unrecorded. True democratization means making space for unnamed, ungated knowledge sources alongside credentialed ones, trusting readers to discern rather than pre-filtering through authority.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.