Periagoge
Concept
1 min read

Naming and Non-naming

Laozi's opening—'the Name that can be named is not the eternal Name'—parallels how indigenous knowledge resists Western categorization while technology demands taxonomy and labels.

Laozi
Why It Matters

The opening of the Tao Te Ching warns that naming limits reality. In Buen Vivir contexts, this reflects indigenous epistemologies that resist Western scientific taxonomy and binary classification. Traditional ecological knowledge carries names embedded in relationships and stories, not extractable into spreadsheets. Yet technology platforms require databases, categories, standardized fields. The Taoist resolution is paradoxical: use names functionally while honoring what exceeds them. A Buen Vivir platform might catalog medicinal plants using both Latin binomials and indigenous names with their full cultural context, recognizing that no label captures the plant's full reality. Code can hold multiple knowledge systems simultaneously without forcing hierarchy. This concept prevents technology from becoming a tool of cultural erasure through standardization. By maintaining spaces where knowledge remains partially unnamed, fluid, and relational, platforms can serve indigenous communities without demanding they translate their worldview into Western categories that diminish their depth and power.

Helpful guides
Laozi
Technology & Attention
Courses
Peri
Questions about Naming and Non-naming?

Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.

Explored In These Journeys
Journey
Live Well With Buen Vivir — Latin American indigenous worldview and technology
View journey

Ready to work on Naming and Non-naming?

Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.