Understanding how language frames technology activism, recognizing that naming shapes perception and possibility.
The Tao Te Ching opens with 'The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.' Yet Laozi also recognizes naming's power—he spent his life teaching through language, through names and concepts. In technology activism, language shapes battle lines. Calling surveillance 'security' versus 'control' frames the entire debate. 'Decentralization' versus 'distributed networks' carries different implications. 'Digital rights' versus 'technological justice' emphasizes different priorities. Activists practice linguistic discernment: noticing how terms were created, who benefits from current naming, what alternative framings become possible. This extends to technical naming—variable names in code, database field names, protocol names—all carry embedded assumptions that shape how systems evolve. The practice involves both refusing imposed names ('users,' 'content,' 'creators') and strategically introducing new ones ('participants,' 'contributors,' 'community members'). Yet Taoist wisdom also counsels against over-attachment to names, recognizing that language ultimately points toward reality but never captures it. The activist becomes fluent in multiple vocabularies while remaining aware of language's limits.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.