How naming technologies shapes what they become; activists must attend carefully to terminology to avoid entrapping their own work.
Laozi warns that naming divides the nameless Tao; once you name something, you constrain its nature. This applies to activist technology: the names we give tools and movements shape their evolution. Calling something 'resistance' activates an oppositional mindset; calling it 'alternative' suggests complementarity. Terms like 'surveillance capitalism' or 'digital colonialism' frame problems in specific ways that enable some solutions while foreclosing others. Activist technologists must attend carefully to the language they adopt, recognizing that corporate platforms design terminology to naturalize their logic. Calling algorithmic sorting 'recommendation' rather than 'curation' or 'manipulation' changes what solutions seem possible. The sage remains conscious of how naming constrains understanding and works with emerging phenomena before language ossifies them into rigid categories. This means activist tech communities should periodically examine whether their terminology still serves their actual values or whether they've internalized corporate framings. New platforms and practices benefit from thoughtful naming that opens rather than closes possibility, language that invites participation rather than asserting authority.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.