Excessive redundancy in data centers reflects attachment and fear; Taoist trust in natural resilience suggests reducing overbuilt backup systems to necessary levels only.
Laozi teaches non-attachment and trust in natural processes. Data centers, by contrast, embody attachment and fear: triple redundancy, backup systems for backup systems, failover mechanisms for failovers—all consuming energy perpetually against theoretical future disasters that rarely arrive. This over-engineering reflects anxiety, not necessity. True resilience, in Taoist understanding, comes from flexibility and adaptation, not fortress-like over-fortification. A data center with moderate redundancy can often recover faster through clever routing and rapid response than one that attempts to make failure impossible through exhaustive duplication. By releasing attachment to the fantasy of zero-failure systems and accepting that resilience comes through diversity and flexibility rather than multiplication, data centers can operate with significantly reduced energy overhead. This requires mature acceptance of inevitable occasional failures and trust that they can be managed without catastrophe. The paradox: less redundancy, designed with wisdom, often proves more resilient and far more energy-efficient than excessive duplication driven by fear.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.