Building climate resilience not through optimized efficiency but through apparently wasteful diversity and redundancy that survives disruption, following natural patterns.
Optimization obsesses over efficiency: maximizing output per input, eliminating redundancy, streamlining systems. Laozi observes that the most resilient systems contain apparent waste—biological diversity, ecological redundancy, multiple pathways. A forest with one tree species faces epidemic; one with hundreds survives. A food system with one staple starves in drought; diversified agriculture persists. Industrial technology pursues optimization that concentrates risk: single-source energy, monoculture agriculture, just-in-time supply chains. Climate resilience requires the opposite: redundant energy sources, diverse food production, distributed systems. This appears inefficient by economic metrics but proves superior under stress. Natural systems aren't optimized; they're resilient through built-in excess and variation. Technological climate response should embrace this: multiple pathways to decarbonization, diverse renewable sources, regenerative agriculture alongside traditional farming, local production alongside trade. The paradox: systems that seem wasteful survive better than systems perfected for today's conditions. Real technological wisdom designs for resilience through intentional redundancy and celebrated diversity.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.