Teaching what we choose not to build and why, developing technological wisdom through explicit study of restraint, refusal, and path-not-taken.
Engineering education teaches design and implementation but rarely teaches refusal, restraint, or the evaluation of whether something should exist at all. Laozi's wisdom includes understanding what not to do. Applied to technological education, this means developing curricula around the shadows—the innovations rejected, the projects not pursued, the technologies we've abandoned or should abandon. What aluminum production did we prevent by choosing not to expand data centers? What water did we preserve by not building certain irrigation technologies? What ecosystems remain intact because we declined to extract minerals? These negative spaces are invisible in traditional technological narratives yet represent the most consequential choices. A Taoist technological education would include: studying failed technologies and why they failed, analyzing technologies we've abandoned and why that was wise, examining innovations we declined and the values that guided refusal, designing projects specifically to minimize impact rather than maximize output. This inverts technological curriculum entirely, treating restraint and discernment as core competencies rather than afterthoughts. The greatest technological wisdom may be knowing which technologies never to build.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.