Recognizing that algorithmic policies, like seasons, require cyclical adaptation rather than permanent implementation, flowing with changing conditions instead of resisting them.
The Taoist understanding of time as cyclical and flowing—not linear—offers wisdom for algorithmic governance that treats policies as temporary experiments rather than permanent laws. Laozi observes how nature constantly transforms; rigid structures crack while flexible ones persist. Most algorithmic systems are locked into annual review cycles that feel artificial and bureaucratic. Instead, a Taoist approach would embed continuous sensing into policy design, allowing rapid feedback loops and seasonal adjustments. This means building 'algorithmic seasons'—periods of intensive data collection, reflection, and conscious adjustment rather than set-and-forget deployment. It acknowledges that what works during an election differs from what works during crisis; what serves during economic stability may fail during disruption. By flowing with temporal change rather than resisting it, we create policies that age gracefully instead of calcifying.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.