Building movements that resist commodification through intentional anti-branding and distributed authorship.
Capitalism expertly absorbs rebellion into brands and products—revolution becomes aesthetic, activism becomes marketing. Laozi understood the danger of attachment to reputation: 'The sage has no fixed mind. The ordinary person fixes the mind.' Applied to activist technology, this suggests strategies for remaining uncommodifiable. Movements might deliberately avoid logos, intentionally distribute credit across many contributors, resist trademarking symbols, build platforms with no central brand to purchase or co-opt. The early internet's open protocols created space for innovation precisely because no single entity owned them. Conversely, platforms with strong brands—Facebook, Twitter—become targets for acquisition and control. This doesn't mean rejecting beauty or clarity of communication, but releasing attachment to consistent branding that becomes an asset to be owned. It means celebrating remixes, forks, and variations rather than demanding fidelity to original design. Historically, the most resilient movements—folk traditions, open-source projects, cultural commons—often have unclear authorship and resist singular origin stories. The activist asks: how do we make this so distributed it can't be branded? How do we build something that belongs to everyone equally?
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.