Keeping blockchain systems in their natural state—avoiding excessive governance, tokenomics design, and feature creep that destroys organic emergence.
Pu—the uncarved block—represents natural simplicity before humans impose meaning. In Taoist philosophy, carving the block into shapes limits its potential. Applied to blockchain governance, this warns against over-designing: governance token mechanisms, upgrade processes, and incentive structures that become too prescriptive. Bitcoin remains closer to pu: minimal governance, change through rough consensus, no designated upgrade path. Ethereum carved itself more thoroughly: designated client teams, governance proposals, complex upgrade procedures. Both work, but Bitcoin preserves more of the uncarved quality—power to shape it lies distributed and latent rather than formalized. The principle suggests: the best blockchains specify what is necessary, then resist the urge to optimize everything. Over-governance turns emergence into management, replacing self-organization with designed outcomes. Decentralization's power lies partly in refusing to perfect systems—leaving friction, inefficiency, and space for participants to find their own patterns.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.