A framework for algorithmic power reduction through gradual delegation and dissolution, following Laozi's principle that the sage accomplishes by undoing rather than doing.
Laozi teaches that the path to wisdom lies in undoing rather than accumulating: forgetting rather than learning, losing rather than gaining. Applied to algorithmic politics, this suggests that concentrated platforms might find health through deliberate decentralization—not by attempting impossible regulation but by gradually undoing the conditions that enable concentrated control. Federation, interoperability standards, and portable identity represent 'undoing' strategies that dissolve single points of power rather than adding oversight layers. The Taoist insight is that trying to regulate a powerful platform is like trying to constrain water with walls; it always finds leaks. Instead, reduce the power that needs constraining. This requires patience and counter-intuitive thinking: sometimes progress means intentionally making systems less efficient if they're less controllable, privileging resilience over optimization. The undoing sequence might mean breaking algorithmic monopolies not through antitrust alone but through deliberate architectural choices that distribute authority. This flows with technological possibility rather than fighting against it.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.