Mirabai's movement through communities of devotees reveals that secure attachment requires embedded social support, not isolated romantic dyads.
Though Mirabai's primary attachment was to Krishna, she moved through communities of bhakti practitioners, performed publicly, engaged in collective devotional practice, and received support from spiritual companions. This concept challenges the modern myth of romantic love as the sole source of attachment security and meaning. Mirabai's model suggests that sustainable healthy attachment requires what theorists call a "secure base"—a community, spiritual lineage, or social network that provides belonging, witness, and support beyond the romantic dyad. Those with insecure attachment patterns often unconsciously select partners expecting them to fulfill all attachment needs—to be lover, parent, therapist, spiritual guide, and best friend simultaneously. This impossible burden creates relational breakdown. Mirabai's example teaches that secure attachment involves maintaining and choosing partners within a larger community context. For those examining attachment style in partner selection, this reveals the importance of asking: Do I have friendships, community, spiritual practice, creative circles, and mentorship relationships that provide connection and support? Or am I seeking one partner to fill all relational voids? Building secure attachment requires developing multiple secure relationships and communities before or alongside romantic partnership, reducing the pressure on partners to meet impossible attachment needs.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.