The distinction between loving someone and needing to own or control them—a bhakti reframing of secure versus insecure attachment.
Mirabai loved Krishna knowing she could never possess him; this paradox is the heart of her theology. Many attachment struggles stem from the unconscious belief that love means ownership—that a secure partner should meet all our needs, be always available, belong entirely to us. Anxious attachment often masks this possessiveness as devotion. Avoidant attachment masks it as independence. Mirabai teaches a third way: total devotion that demands nothing in return, love that celebrates the beloved's freedom. This doesn't mean indifference or lack of commitment; Mirabai was fiercely committed. Rather, it means loving the person as they are, not as a fantasy we've constructed. In romantic relationships, this means: Can I love my partner while trusting their autonomy? Can I be devoted without demanding they prove their love through constant presence or reassurance? This shift from possession to genuine devotion marks the move toward secure attachment.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.