Mirabai's practice was not about resolving longing but deepening it; grief's rage sometimes reflects our refusal to accept that longing itself—not its fulfillment—may be what sustains us.
One of the most misunderstood aspects of Mirabai's bhakti is the idea that her longing for Krishna should eventually end in union or closure. It did not. She lived her entire life in yearning, and this was not failure but the point itself. The longing kept her devotion alive, raw, sincere. This challenges contemporary grief work's implicit goal: to move through loss toward a new normal, to reach acceptance and move forward. Mirabai suggests something different. Perhaps the longing itself—for the person who died, for the life we imagined, for reunion—is what continues to connect us to what we love. Perhaps closure is not the goal but deepening. The rage beneath grief often emerges because we are being asked to let go in a culture that provides no template for how to continue loving someone or something we have lost. Mirabai's eternal return to longing suggests that we need not resolve this tension. We can live with both the fact of loss and the reality of continuing love. The rage may soften over time, but the longing—the devotion—can remain as a way of honoring and staying connected to what matters most.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.